-
1 hear
1. transitive verb,1) hörenI can hardly hear myself think/speak — ich kann keinen klaren Gedanken fassen/kann mein eigenes Wort nicht verstehen
2) (understand) verstehen3) (Law) [an]hören; verhandeln [Fall]2. intransitive verb,hear about somebody/something — von jemandem/etwas [etwas] hören
3. interjectionhe wouldn't hear of it — er wollte nichts davon hören
Hear! Hear! — bravo!; richtig!
Phrasal Verbs:- academic.ru/120100/hearout">hearout* * *[hiə]past tense, past participle - heard; verb1) (to (be able to) receive( sounds) by ear: I don't hear very well; Speak louder - I can't hear you; I didn't hear you come in.) hören2) (to listen to for some purpose: A judge hears court cases; Part of a manager's job is to hear workers' complaints.) anhören3) (to receive information, news etc, not only by ear: I've heard that story before; I hear that you're leaving; `Have you heard from your sister?' `Yes, I got a letter from her today'; I've never heard of him - who is he? This is the first I've heard of the plan.) hören•- hearing- hearing-aid
- hearsay
- hear! hear! - I
- he will
- would not hear of* * *<heard, heard>[hɪəʳ, AM hɪr]I. vt1. (perceive with ears)▪ to \hear sth/sb etw/jdn hörenspeak up, I can't \hear you sprich lauter, ich kann dich nicht hörenJane \heard him go out Jane hörte, wie er hinausging2. (be told)▪ to \hear sth etw hören [o erfahren]we haven't heard anything of Jan for months wir haben seit Monaten nichts von Jan gehört▪ to \hear that/what... hören, dass/was...have you \heard what's happened? hast du schon gehört, was passiert ist?3. (listen)I \heard the orchestra play at Carnegie Hall ich habe das Orchester in der Carnegie Hall spielen hörenthe case will be \heard by the High Court der Fall wird vor dem Obersten Gericht verhandeltLord, \hear us/our prayers Herr, erhöre uns/unsere Gebete5.yeah, I \hear what you're saying ja, ich weiß [schon], was du meinsthe's offered to wash the dishes — I must be \hearing things! er hat mir angeboten, abzuwaschen — was, ich hör' wohl nicht richtig!II. vi1. (perceive with ears) hörenit's a terrible line, I can't \hear die Verbindung ist fürchterlich, ich kann nichts hörento \hear very well sehr gut hören können2. (be told about) etw hören [o erfahren]if you haven't \heard by Friday, assume I'm coming wenn du bis Freitag nichts gehört hast, kannst du davon ausgehen, dass ich kommehave you \heard about Jane getting married? hast du schon gehört, dass Jane heiratet?▪ to \hear from sb von jdm hörenwe haven't \heard from her in ages wir haben seit Ewigkeiten nichts von ihr gehörtyou'll be \hearing from my solicitor! Sie werden noch von meinem Anwalt hören!3. (know of)to have \heard of sb/sth von jdm/etw gehört habendo you know Derrida? — I've \heard of him kennen Sie Derrida? — ich habe mal von ihm gehörtto have never \heard of sb/sth nie von jdm/etw gehört haben4.▶ do you \hear? verstehst du/verstehen Sie?, kapiert? sl▶ \hear, \hear! ja, genau!, richtig [so]!* * *[hɪə(r)] pret, ptp heard1. vt1) (= also learn) hörenI heard him say that... — ich habe ihn sagen hören, dass...
I heard somebody come in — ich habe jemanden ( herein)kommen hören
there wasn't a sound to be heard —
he was heard to say that... — man hat ihn sagen hören, dass...
to make oneself heard — sich (dat) Gehör verschaffen
you're not going, do you hear me! — du gehst nicht, hörst du (mich)!
to hear him speak you'd think... — wenn man ihn so reden hört, könnte man meinen,...
I've often heard say or it said that... — ich habe oft gehört or sagen hören, dass...
I hear you play chess —
have you heard the one about...? I hear tell you're going away — (haben Sie) den schon gehört von...? ich höre, Sie gehen weg
I've been hearing things about you — von dir hört man ja schöne Dinge
I must be hearing things — ich glaube, ich höre nicht richtig
2) (= listen to) lecture, programme etc hörenLord, hear our prayer Lord, hear us let's hear your prayers before you go to sleep — Herr, (er)höre unser Gebet Herr, erhöre uns wir wollen beten, bevor du schläfst
2. vi1) (physically) hörenhear, hear! — (sehr) richtig!; (Parl) hört!, hört!
2) (= get news) hörenhe's left his wife – yes, so I hear —
have you heard about John? he's getting married —
never heard of him/it —
I hear about nothing else ( but that)! — ich höre überhaupt nichts anderes mehr!
* * *A v/t1. hören:I hear him laugh(ing) ich höre ihn lachen;I couldn’t hear myself talk ich verstand mein eigenes Wort nicht mehr;make o.s. heard sich Gehör verschaffen;let’s hear it for … einen Applaus für …about, of von, über akk):from what I’ve heard soviel ich gehört habe;did you hear the one about …? kennst du den von …?are you hearing me? hörst du mir überhaupt zu?;hear sb out jemanden bis zum Ende anhören, jemanden ausreden lassen4. (an)hören:5. eine Bitte, ein Gebet etc erhören:hear sb’s prayers auch jemanden erhören6. hören auf (akk), jemandes Rat folgen7. JURa) jemanden vernehmen, -hörenb) (über) einen Fall verhandeln:8. einen Schüler, das Gelernte abhörenB v/i1. hören:I have heard tell of it umg ich habe davon sprechen hören;he would not hear of it er wollte nichts davon hören oder wissen;hear! hear!a) bravo!, sehr richtig!,b) iron hört! hört!2. hören, erfahren ( beide:I haven’t heard from him since then ich habe seit damals nichts mehr von ihm gehört;so I have heard, so I hear das habe ich gehört;you will hear of this! umg das wirst du mir büßen!* * *1. transitive verb,1) hörenI can hardly hear myself think/speak — ich kann keinen klaren Gedanken fassen/kann mein eigenes Wort nicht verstehen
2) (understand) verstehen3) (Law) [an]hören; verhandeln [Fall]2. intransitive verb,3. interjectionhear about somebody/something — von jemandem/etwas [etwas] hören
Hear! Hear! — bravo!; richtig!
Phrasal Verbs:- hearout* * *v.(§ p.,p.p.: heard)= hören v.vernehmen v. -
2 hear
<heard, heard> [hɪəʳ, Am hɪr] vt1) ( perceive with ears)to \hear sth/sb etw/jdn hören;speak up, I can't \hear you sprich lauter, ich kann dich nicht hören;Jane \heard him go out Jane hörte, wie er hinausging2) ( be told)to \hear sth etw hören [o erfahren];have you \heard the news that she's pregnant? weißt du schon das Neueste? sie ist schwanger!;we haven't heard anything of Jan for months wir haben seit Monaten nichts von Jan gehört;to \hear that/what... hören, dass/was...;have you \heard what's happened? hast du schon gehört, was passiert ist?3) ( listen)to \hear sth sich dat etw anhören;( be there and listen) etw hören;I \heard the orchestra play at Carnegie Hall ich habe das Orchester in der Carnegie Hall spielen hörenthe case will be \heard by the High Court der Fall wird vor dem Obersten Gericht verhandelt;Lord, \hear us/ our prayers Herr, erhöre uns/unsere GebetePHRASES:he's offered to wash the dishes - I must be \hearing things! er hat mir angeboten, abzuwaschen - was, ich hör' wohl nicht richtig!;to \hear what sb is saying;yeah, I \hear what you're saying ja, ich weiß [schon], was du meinst vi1) ( perceive with ears) hören;it's a terrible line, I can't \hear die Verbindung ist fürchterlich, ich kann nichts hören;to \hear very well sehr gut hören könnenif you haven't \heard by Friday, assume I'm coming wenn du bis Freitag nichts gehört hast, kannst du davon ausgehen, dass ich komme;have you \heard about Jane getting married? hast du schon gehört, dass Jane heiratet?;to \hear from sb von jdm hören;we haven't \heard from her in ages wir haben seit Ewigkeiten nichts von ihr gehört;you'll be \hearing from my solicitor! Sie werden noch von meinem Anwalt hören!3) ( know of)to have \heard of sb/ sth von jdm/etw gehört haben;do you know Derrida? - I've \heard of him kennen Sie Derrida? - ich habe mal von ihm gehört;to have never \heard of sb/ sth nie von jdm/etw gehört habenPHRASES:sb won't \hear of sth jd will von etw dat nichts hören;do you \hear? verstehst du/verstehen Sie?, kapiert? (sl)°\hear, \hear! ja, genau!, richtig [so]! -
3 hear
A vtr1 ( perceive with ears) entendre [sound, thud, voice, car, radio] ; she heard her brother coming up the stairs elle a entendu son frère qui montait l'escalier ; I can hear the train whistling j'entends siffler le train ; an explosion was heard on a entendu une explosion ; I can hear you! je t'entends! ; I heard you coming in je t'ai entendu quand tu es rentré ; to hear sb being beaten/thanked entendre que l'on est en train de battre/de remercier qn ; to hear her talk, you'd think (that) à l'entendre, on croirait que ; we haven't heard the end ou last of it on n'a pas fini d'en entendre parler ; to make oneself ou one's voice heard lit se faire entendre ; fig faire entendre sa voix ; I can't hear myself think! il y a tellement de bruit que je n'arrive pas à me concentrer ;2 (learn, find out about) apprendre [news, story, joke, rumour] ; to hear (tell) of sth entendre parler de qch ; to hear (it said) that apprendre que, entendre dire que ; I've heard good things about… j'ai entendu dire du bien de… ; I've heard so much about you on m'a tant parlé de vous ; I've heard it all before! je connais la chanson ○ ! ; have you heard the one about… ( joke) tu connais celle de… ; have you heard? tu es au courant? ; what have you heard? tu es au courant de quelque chose? ; I'm sorry to hear (that) you can't come je suis désolé d'apprendre que vous ne pouvez pas venir ; I hear you want to be a doctor il paraît que tu veux devenir médecin ; so I hear, so I've heard c'est ce que j'ai entendu dire ; she won, I hear elle a gagné, paraît-il ; to hear whether/why/how savoir si/pourquoi/comment ;3 ( listen to) écouter [lecture, speech, broadcast, concert, record] ; [judge, court, jury] entendre [case, evidence, testimony, witness] ; écouter [prayer] ; to hear sb do sth écouter qn faire qch ; to hear a child read faire lire un enfant à voix haute ; to hear what sb has to say entendre ce que qn a à dire ; do you hear (me)? tu m'entends? ; to hear Mass sout assister à la messe, entendre la messe sout ; the court heard that… Jur il a été déclaré à la cour que…B vi entendre ; to hear about entendre parler de ; have you heard about Matt and Sarah? tu es au courant pour Matt et Sarah?hear! hear! bravo! ; let's hear it for Jo on applaudit Jo bien fort.■ hear from:▶ hear from [sb]1 ( get news from) recevoir des nouvelles de [friend, relative] ; it's nice to hear from you je suis content d'avoir de tes nouvelles ; I'm waiting to hear from head office/the hospital j'attends une réponse du siège social/de l'hôpital ; don't do anything until you hear from me ne fais rien tant que je ne t'aurai pas fait pas signe ; you'll be hearing from me! ( threat) tu auras de mes nouvelles! ; you'll be hearing from my solicitor vous en parlerez à mon avocat ;2 ( hear interviewed on TV etc) entendre le point de vue de [representative, politician] ; écouter le récit de [survivor, eyewitness].■ hear of:▶ hear of [sb/sth]1 ( be or become aware of) entendre parler de ; I've never even heard of her je ne sais même pas qui c'est ; the first I heard of the accident was on the radio j'ai appris l'accident par la radio ; that's the first I've heard of it! première nouvelle! ; he hasn't been heard of since on n'a plus jamais entendu parler de lui ;2 (countenance, consider) I won't hear of it! il n'en est pas question!■ hear out:▶ hear out [sb], hear [sb] out écouter [qn] jusqu'au bout. -
4 Knowledge
It is indeed an opinion strangely prevailing amongst men, that houses, mountains, rivers, and, in a word, all sensible objects, have an existence, natural or real, distinct from their being perceived by the understanding. But, with how great an assurance and acquiescence soever this principle may be entertained in the world, yet whoever shall find in his heart to call it into question may, if I mistake not, perceive it to involve a manifest contradiction. For, what are the forementioned objects but things we perceive by sense? and what do we perceive besides our own ideas or sensations? and is it not plainly repugnant that any one of these, or any combination of them, should exist unperceived? (Berkeley, 1996, Pt. I, No. 4, p. 25)It seems to me that the only objects of the abstract sciences or of demonstration are quantity and number, and that all attempts to extend this more perfect species of knowledge beyond these bounds are mere sophistry and illusion. As the component parts of quantity and number are entirely similar, their relations become intricate and involved; and nothing can be more curious, as well as useful, than to trace, by a variety of mediums, their equality or inequality, through their different appearances.But as all other ideas are clearly distinct and different from each other, we can never advance farther, by our utmost scrutiny, than to observe this diversity, and, by an obvious reflection, pronounce one thing not to be another. Or if there be any difficulty in these decisions, it proceeds entirely from the undeterminate meaning of words, which is corrected by juster definitions. That the square of the hypotenuse is equal to the squares of the other two sides cannot be known, let the terms be ever so exactly defined, without a train of reasoning and enquiry. But to convince us of this proposition, that where there is no property, there can be no injustice, it is only necessary to define the terms, and explain injustice to be a violation of property. This proposition is, indeed, nothing but a more imperfect definition. It is the same case with all those pretended syllogistical reasonings, which may be found in every other branch of learning, except the sciences of quantity and number; and these may safely, I think, be pronounced the only proper objects of knowledge and demonstration. (Hume, 1975, Sec. 12, Pt. 3, pp. 163-165)Our knowledge springs from two fundamental sources of the mind; the first is the capacity of receiving representations (the ability to receive impressions), the second is the power to know an object through these representations (spontaneity in the production of concepts).Through the first, an object is given to us; through the second, the object is thought in relation to that representation.... Intuition and concepts constitute, therefore, the elements of all our knowledge, so that neither concepts without intuition in some way corresponding to them, nor intuition without concepts, can yield knowledge. Both may be either pure or empirical.... Pure intuitions or pure concepts are possible only a priori; empirical intuitions and empirical concepts only a posteriori. If the receptivity of our mind, its power of receiving representations in so far as it is in any way affected, is to be called "sensibility," then the mind's power of producing representations from itself, the spontaneity of knowledge, should be called "understanding." Our nature is so constituted that our intuitions can never be other than sensible; that is, it contains only the mode in which we are affected by objects. The faculty, on the other hand, which enables us to think the object of sensible intuition is the understanding.... Without sensibility, no object would be given to us; without understanding, no object would be thought. Thoughts without content are empty; intuitions without concepts are blind. It is therefore just as necessary to make our concepts sensible, that is, to add the object to them in intuition, as to make our intuitions intelligible, that is to bring them under concepts. These two powers or capacities cannot exchange their functions. The understanding can intuit nothing, the senses can think nothing. Only through their union can knowledge arise. (Kant, 1933, Sec. 1, Pt. 2, B74-75 [p. 92])Metaphysics, as a natural disposition of Reason is real, but it is also, in itself, dialectical and deceptive.... Hence to attempt to draw our principles from it, and in their employment to follow this natural but none the less fallacious illusion can never produce science, but only an empty dialectical art, in which one school may indeed outdo the other, but none can ever attain a justifiable and lasting success. In order that, as a science, it may lay claim not merely to deceptive persuasion, but to insight and conviction, a Critique of Reason must exhibit in a complete system the whole stock of conceptions a priori, arranged according to their different sources-the Sensibility, the understanding, and the Reason; it must present a complete table of these conceptions, together with their analysis and all that can be deduced from them, but more especially the possibility of synthetic knowledge a priori by means of their deduction, the principles of its use, and finally, its boundaries....This much is certain: he who has once tried criticism will be sickened for ever of all the dogmatic trash he was compelled to content himself with before, because his Reason, requiring something, could find nothing better for its occupation. Criticism stands to the ordinary school metaphysics exactly in the same relation as chemistry to alchemy, or as astron omy to fortune-telling astrology. I guarantee that no one who has comprehended and thought out the conclusions of criticism, even in these Prolegomena, will ever return to the old sophistical pseudo-science. He will rather look forward with a kind of pleasure to a metaphysics, certainly now within his power, which requires no more preparatory discoveries, and which alone can procure for reason permanent satisfaction. (Kant, 1891, pp. 115-116)Knowledge is only real and can only be set forth fully in the form of science, in the form of system. Further, a so-called fundamental proposition or first principle of philosophy, even if it is true, it is yet none the less false, just because and in so far as it is merely a fundamental proposition, merely a first principle. It is for that reason easily refuted. The refutation consists in bringing out its defective character; and it is defective because it is merely the universal, merely a principle, the beginning. If the refutation is complete and thorough, it is derived and developed from the nature of the principle itself, and not accomplished by bringing in from elsewhere other counter-assurances and chance fancies. It would be strictly the development of the principle, and thus the completion of its deficiency, were it not that it misunderstands its own purport by taking account solely of the negative aspect of what it seeks to do, and is not conscious of the positive character of its process and result. The really positive working out of the beginning is at the same time just as much the very reverse: it is a negative attitude towards the principle we start from. Negative, that is to say, in its one-sided form, which consists in being primarily immediate, a mere purpose. It may therefore be regarded as a refutation of what constitutes the basis of the system; but more correctly it should be looked at as a demonstration that the basis or principle of the system is in point of fact merely its beginning. (Hegel, 1910, pp. 21-22)Knowledge, action, and evaluation are essentially connected. The primary and pervasive significance of knowledge lies in its guidance of action: knowing is for the sake of doing. And action, obviously, is rooted in evaluation. For a being which did not assign comparative values, deliberate action would be pointless; and for one which did not know, it would be impossible. Conversely, only an active being could have knowledge, and only such a being could assign values to anything beyond his own feelings. A creature which did not enter into the process of reality to alter in some part the future content of it, could apprehend a world only in the sense of intuitive or esthetic contemplation; and such contemplation would not possess the significance of knowledge but only that of enjoying and suffering. (Lewis, 1946, p. 1)"Evolutionary epistemology" is a branch of scholarship that applies the evolutionary perspective to an understanding of how knowledge develops. Knowledge always involves getting information. The most primitive way of acquiring it is through the sense of touch: amoebas and other simple organisms know what happens around them only if they can feel it with their "skins." The knowledge such an organism can have is strictly about what is in its immediate vicinity. After a huge jump in evolution, organisms learned to find out what was going on at a distance from them, without having to actually feel the environment. This jump involved the development of sense organs for processing information that was farther away. For a long time, the most important sources of knowledge were the nose, the eyes, and the ears. The next big advance occurred when organisms developed memory. Now information no longer needed to be present at all, and the animal could recall events and outcomes that happened in the past. Each one of these steps in the evolution of knowledge added important survival advantages to the species that was equipped to use it.Then, with the appearance in evolution of humans, an entirely new way of acquiring information developed. Up to this point, the processing of information was entirely intrasomatic.... But when speech appeared (and even more powerfully with the invention of writing), information processing became extrasomatic. After that point knowledge did not have to be stored in the genes, or in the memory traces of the brain; it could be passed on from one person to another through words, or it could be written down and stored on a permanent substance like stone, paper, or silicon chips-in any case, outside the fragile and impermanent nervous system. (Csikszentmihalyi, 1993, pp. 56-57)Historical dictionary of quotations in cognitive science > Knowledge
См. также в других словарях:
List of Heroes characters with special abilities — This is an alphabetical list of characters with special abilities appearing in the television series Heroes as well as the Heroes graphic novels. A more extensive list of Heroes characters can be found at List of characters in Heroes . Main… … Wikipedia
List of Late Night with Conan O'Brien sketches — For a list of sketches that debuted on The Tonight Show with Conan O Brien, see List of The Tonight Show with Conan O Brien sketches. The following is a list of sketches which debuted on Late Night with Conan O Brien on NBC. Contents 1 Late Night … Wikipedia
sound reception — Introduction response of an organism s aural mechanism, the ear, to a specific form of energy change, or sound waves. Sound waves can be transmitted through gases, liquids, or solids, but the hearing function of each species is particularly … Universalium
Sensory substitution — means to transform the characteristics of one sensory modality into stimuli of another sensory modality. It is hoped that sensory substitution systems can help handicapped people by restoring their ability to perceive a certain defective sensory… … Wikipedia
pick up — verb 1. take and lift upward (Freq. 22) • Syn: ↑lift up, ↑gather up • Hypernyms: ↑raise, ↑lift, ↑elevate, ↑get up, ↑bring up … Useful english dictionary
Perception — For other uses, see Perception (disambiguation). Perceptual redirects here. For the Brian Blade album, see Perceptual (album). Robert Fludd s depiction of perception (1619) … Wikipedia
Cochlear implant — A cochlear implant (CI) is a surgically implanted electronic device that provides a sense of sound to a person who is profoundly deaf or severely hard of hearing. The cochlear implant is often referred to as a bionic ear. As of December 2010,… … Wikipedia
Glossary of medical terms related to communications disorders — This is a glossary of medical terms related to communications disorders such as blindness and deafness. NOTOC A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z A Acoustic neuroma tumor, usually benign, which may develop on the hearing and… … Wikipedia
nervous system, human — ▪ anatomy Introduction system that conducts stimuli from sensory receptors to the brain and spinal cord and that conducts impulses back to other parts of the body. As with other higher vertebrates, the human nervous system has two main… … Universalium
Cat — For other uses, see Cat (disambiguation) and Cats (disambiguation). Domestic cat[1] … Wikipedia
Apostasy in Christianity — Judas betrays Jesus with a kiss. Judas Iscariot, one of the Twelve Apostles, became an apostate.[1] Apostasy in Christianity refers to the rejection of Christianity by someone who formerly was a Christian. The term apostasy comes from the Greek… … Wikipedia